Thursday, April 12, 2012
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Source Analysis
Steven Schwarz
English 102
4/10/2012
Source Analysis
Throughout the second paper about animal emotions, there were
a series of scholarly sources being used.
Half of them are well known household names in their respective fields,
and half not so. As opposed to using these
sources as a means to only verify what the writer is agreeing with, they also
used scholarly sources such as Theophrastus, a student of Aristotle, to show
the alternative way of thinking. This
shows actual turmoil within scholarly sources to show that this topic has been
debated over amongst the leaders in the profession.
Every source has been given its frame of reference. When the writer introduces a new source in
the paper, they state what the source does and most times they give information
as to where they received their training and what generation they were from.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
Stakeholders
Steven Schwarz
English 102
4/5/2012
Stakeholders
The stakeholders of my research paper are as follows. My first stakeholder is ABC itself. They are the channel in which my show
exists. What lies at stake for them is
their integrity as a network, and of course ratings. My own stake in comparison is different
simply because I don’t care about their ratings, or their network’s
success. My concerns exist for who wins
the show, only because My family and I bet on the winners.
The second set of stakeholders would be the contestants on the
show. The 25 women being chosen care
about their personal image, and finding love.
If they are publicly humiliated on this show for any reason it will
carry over into their lives off the show.
Once again my stake in the matter only matches the one girl I chose to
win. I wish for her to maintain a good
reputation and end up winning the show as to preserve my good taste in women of
course!
The Bachelors themselves hold stake in this. Their decisions week by week are heavily criticized,
and they too wish to pick the right girl for them. If his taste for women matches mine, then his
stake partially matches mine as well. I of course don’t have a reputation
publicly riding on his decision, but I do want him to pick a good girl for his
sake. Should the girl I pick be that
good girl he’s looking for, it’s a win-win situation.
Chris Harrison, the host of the show is another source who holds
stake in the matter. His ability to
diffuse problems on the show and manage the contestants while also making his
dialogue in the show entertaining for viewers are his concerns. He appears to want what’s best for the
bachelor, either from genuine concern, or to maintain the show’s integrity. For the most part his stake doesn’t match
mine aside from wanting the bachelor on the show to make a good decision that
he’ll be happy with. He has pressures to
publicly manage the contestants well, in order to keep the show as classy but
still entertaining as possible.
The rest of my resources are critics and scholarly viewers who
wrote about the pros and cons of shows such as this one. Their stake most
accurately matches mine, because they wish to know and spread the understanding
of why and how this show affects the public.
They want the show to be as real and unscripted as possible, and to
believe that what happens in the show can stand as lessons for people in the
world to learn from. They want the
truths that ABC doesn’t address publicly about the staging of the show, whether it’s true or not.
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Revision
Steven Schwarz
English 102
4/3/2012
Revision Strategy
I chose to revise my paper page by
page here.
Page one
First thing I’ll do is completely
remove my first paragraph. Across the
board, everyone told me it was too broad of a topic to start, and it doesn’t
capture the essence of what my paper is about. I’ll have to start with
something a bit more practical and relevant to my topic. I have a series of questions in my second
paragraph that preview what I will be talking about throughout the paper. Everyone told me I should draw more attention
to the main topic of my paper and explain how the other questions relate.
Page two
I was told that the second paragraph
could be strengthened by using a source.
I will do that. The beginning of
the last paragraph on this page needs to be drawn to the main topic for
relevance as well.
Page three
One source told me to clarify what I
was writing in this page for both relevance and in how I explained things.
Page four
Revise the first sentence of the
second paragraph for clarity on what I was saying. I was told to break down the quotes in the
last paragraph for more detail as to what it is implying.
Page five
I need to elaborate more on societal
pressures in the first paragraph. There
is also a quote in the second paragraph that needs to be cut down in length.
Page six
Using a source in the first paragraph
with help my paper.
Page seven
Explaining who my sources are will
help readers to understand why things are said by certain sources. Once again relating the things I say in this
page to my main topic will help strengthen my paper.
Page eight through the rest of the
paper is without comments. I assume I
did well on these pages for my conclusion.
Some ending comments after the paper was read were made. I need to draw more attention to my main
topic. Working on my transition
sentences will help as well.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
